Create a free Global Cosmetic Industry account to continue reading

Consumers Are Buying Less but Expecting More. Here's What That Means for Beauty.

Lower-income consumers are more likely to prioritize products tailored to their skin type or concerns (40%), while higher-income shoppers lean more heavily on brand trust (43%).
Lower-income consumers are more likely to prioritize products tailored to their skin type or concerns (40%), while higher-income shoppers lean more heavily on brand trust (43%).
Prostock-studio at Adobe Stock

Beauty spending in spring 2026 is being reshaped less by outright cutbacks and more by precision, according to the Alvarez & Marsal Consumer Sentiment Spring 2026 Report. Consumers are still willing to spend, but they expect something in return.

Across the category, 43% of consumers have simplified their beauty routines, but simplification is not translating into blanket downtrading. Instead, spending is concentrating. Hair care and skin care are holding up as necessity categories, while fragrance and makeup are increasingly treated as discretionary, creating a clearer hierarchy within beauty baskets.

Overall sentiment remains cautious. The Alvarez & Marsal Consumer Sentiment Spring 2026 Report shows net beauty spending intent at -3%, meaning slightly more consumers plan to reduce rather than increase spend. Personal care is marginally more resilient at -1%, but both sit well below neutral, signaling stabilization rather than growth.

Beneath the headline softness, however, is a sharp income split. Spending expectations diverge by 15-20 percentage points between high- and low-income households, with higher earners continuing to support category growth while lower-income consumers pull back more aggressively. This divergence is also why beauty and groceries are outperforming other discretionary categories like electronics and home goods, which show deeper contraction.

At the same time, about 20% of consumers are still trading up in beauty, even in a cautious environment. The motivations are increasingly functional rather than aspirational: 51% cite higher-quality ingredients or “clean” formulations, 43% prioritize better performance, and 40% point to brand trust and perceived quality.

These trade-up drivers also reveal a subtle income divide. Lower-income consumers are more likely to prioritize products tailored to their skin type or concerns (40%), while higher-income shoppers lean more heavily on brand trust (43%). Across both groups, however, efficacy and ingredient quality consistently outrank luxury positioning, signaling a shift from status-driven beauty to results-driven selection.

Technology is accelerating that decision-making process. Between 25% and 41% of consumers now use AI for product discovery, research and value comparison across beauty, apparel and grocery, with adoption highest among younger cohorts. Among consumers aged 18-44, 64% actively ask AI for recommendations, and 66% say they act on those suggestions, embedding algorithmic guidance directly into purchase behavior.

Taken together, spring 2026 points to a beauty market that is not collapsing, but concentrating: fewer steps, higher scrutiny, stronger reliance on performance signals and an increasingly digital path to purchase that is quietly reshaping how spending decisions are made.

More in Consumers & Markets